Comolli’s anger at refereeing: Former worldwide referee solutions TFC president

obligatory
The president of TFC Damien Comolli didn’t mince phrases on Sunday, January 15, after the match with Brześć (1: 1). Specifically, he questioned match referee Benoît Millot and French arbitration extra usually. Former worldwide ‘man in black’ Bruno Derrien responds to Toulouse’s feedback.

Did the match referee make the precise resolution to acknowledge Brest’s objective?

The motion takes place from the nook and the pictures clearly present that in his extension Brestois Mounier is taller than defender Toulouse. He positive aspects momentum and lays his head down and it is true he has a hand or elbow on the Toulouse defender’s face and neck as he goes down. So after his extension, he does not depend on Rasmus Nicolaisen. The referee does not see it, there are plenty of gamers and the whole lot goes quick. And in such a scenario, VAR can intervene if it considers that the referee has made an apparent mistake … Nonetheless, the whole lot relies on the interpretation of the manifesto.

Additionally learn:
TFC-Brest: on the controversial Breton objective, what are the stakeholders saying?

After the objective, we see the referee speaking along with his hand on the headphones, however he did not go to test the pictures himself…

So which means that it was checked and that there was no debate for the VAR referee and that he was in the identical place because the central referee. Had the scenario been reversed, he would have invited heart referee Benoît Millot to maneuver over and examine the picture.

How does the trade between the referee and the VAR go?

In fact, when the central referee makes a clearly flawed resolution, he’s warned by the VAR who has to inform him: “I do not share your feeling, within the image I see this, this and this. And advises him to go and take a look at the work.” The ultimate resolution all the time rests with the central referee. On this case, within the match between Toulouse and Brest, even when there was a debate between the 2 referees, they needed to be on the identical wavelength.

“I share his need to make public the exchanges between the judges”

Do you perceive Damien Comolli’s name for extra transparency on these exchanges?

It’s true that for the sake of transparency and higher understanding of referees’ selections, as is the case in rugby and in some L1 matches this season, it will be attention-grabbing to know what was mentioned. What was the place of the VAR and referee. In that sense, I’m in favor of this transparency. I share his opinion when he says that he desires to go public.

Additionally learn:
Ligue 1. TFC-Brest: “It is a scandal, 15 years of conceitedness and mediocrity!” Damien Comolla’s Large Tirade on Arbitration

Is rugby one step forward of soccer relating to refereeing?

They’ve been outfitted with VAR for a while and within the High 14 the whole lot that occurs on the pitch is heard by the viewers. However beware, rugby gamers do not behave the identical as soccer gamers. The rugby referee may be very calm, not surrounded, we do not ask him to go see the VAR, we do not put strain on him when he watches the video… In soccer it is nonetheless one thing particular.

“Opposite to fashionable perception, VAR didn’t repair all of the errors…”

Is it the mentality of the soccer subject that stops such progress?

Let’s simply say that altering the mentality in soccer takes time. However for my part, at some point we are going to obtain this transparency. Issues have moved ahead. At the moment, there was no objective line expertise, no fourth referee, no VAR system… Issues are transferring ahead.

How do you clarify that regardless of the appearance of VAR, there’s nonetheless a lot controversy after Ligue 1 matches each week?

Opposite to fashionable perception, VAR didn’t repair all of the errors. Photographs will not be black or white, they’re usually gray. We interpret the picture. I bear in mind after I was a referee we went to observe at Clairefontaine. There have additionally been match conditions the place the chief umpire would ask us, “What’s your resolution on this motion?” Properly, there was by no means a unanimity. There could be no unanimity as a result of by definition arbitration means interpretation. So after all we now have to try for some type of uniformity in sure selections, however there’ll by no means be uniformity. And thankfully, as a result of arbitration should stay with a human face. Anybody who thinks that with VAR there shall be no extra controversy is totally flawed. He even added different interpretation polemics. However that is the salt of soccer, the human facet.

The TFC president additionally criticized the shortage of dialogue and communication with the referees…

It additionally criticizes the angle we should undertake on earth. It requires much less conceitedness, though not everyone seems to be smug. However normally, we have to be extra fluid, convey our message to the actors with out being smug or smug. We could be calm, smiling, however agency.

Do you suppose referees must be allowed to talk in public like most gamers on the pitch?

There shall be a brand new route of judging and maybe new directions shall be issued. Let’s hope. Even when we now have to present them time to use it, however I do not suppose it is illogical there both, that the referee can clarify himself.

Leave a Comment